4 Pregnant women with kidney disease require additional treatments, changes in diet and medication, and frequent visits to their healthcare provider. Nearly one-fifth of women who develop preeclampsia early in pregnancy are found to have undiagnosed kidney disease. But kidney disease can cause difficulties getting and staying pregnant as well as problems during pregnancy, including preterm delivery, low birth weight, and preeclampsia. Kidney disease. Women with mild kidney disease often have healthy pregnancies.That is another reason for women with diabetes to keep tight control of their blood sugar. 3 Babies of mothers with diabetes tend to be large and are likely to have low blood sugar soon after birth. Even women whose diabetes is well under control may have changes in their metabolism during pregnancy that require extra care or treatment to promote a healthy birth. During the first few weeks of pregnancy, often before a woman even knows she is pregnant, high blood sugar levels can cause birth defects. Diabetes. It is important for women with diabetes to manage their blood sugar levels both before getting pregnant and throughout pregnancy.Women with PCOS have higher rates of pregnancy loss before 20 weeks of pregnancy, diabetes during pregnancy (gestational diabetes), preeclampsia, and cesarean section. 1 It is very important for women to have their blood pressure checked at every prenatal visit so that healthcare providers can detect any changes and make decisions about treatment. Uncontrolled high blood pressure, however, can damage the mother’s kidneys and increase the risk for low birth weight or preeclampsia. You can try it here: High blood pressure. Even though high blood pressure can be risky for the mother and fetus, most women with slightly high blood pressure and no other diseases have healthy pregnancies and healthy deliveries because they get their blood pressure under control before pregnancy. But I'll keep my account and I look forward to seeing it evolve. I've had an account for less than a week so far and I'm not yet sure that I would benefit by moving from Flickr to Fotopark. ![]() But just like Flickr, Fotopark makes no assumptions as to the type of camera you use. I suspect that this statistic will not be the same on Fotopark, as it is appealing to a different crowd. For non-paid work - and even for more serious assignments - smaller cameras make much more sense than bigger ones. On Flickr, the most popular camera by far is the iPhone. This will be eventually expanded internationally. In the EU, you can order high quality prints from your photos. There will also be a mobile app (naturally). Fotopark has only lost my position once (there are still a few bugs).Ĭomments will be allowed but are currently not enabled. Sometimes Flickr would occasionally lose my position in a stream and I'd have to scroll all the way along to return. The problem is that it is a bit slow - the further along you go in a given photostream, the longer it takes to reload it. New photos, and you click on a photo, you can click the back button in your browser and be returned to the same position that you left. If I liked it, I'd click the appropriate button. Sometimes on Flickr, I'll want to view a photo to check a certain detail. The number of views that a photo gets is not relevant and possibly distracting. ![]() One tally that Fotopark does not keep is view count. The word 'favorited' is not a word (outside of a grade 2 playground) and I do wish that Twitter, among others, would change that. I also am impressed that when you view the tally of a photo's likes and favourites, they are written as "Liked by x users" and "Favored by x users". This is an important distinction and I'm glad that Leica understands that. The first thing I noticed on Fotopark was that there are two ways to mark a photo: like (heart) or favourite (star). Still, it doesn't matter because I have never seen a single video on Flickr anywhere, thankfully. Flickr is trying to be all things to all men and this 'feature' of 3' HD videos is a distraction. A positive feature of Fotopark over Flickr: it's photographs only - no videos. Flickr offers 1TB for free and charges $49.99 per year to remove ads an extra TB can be purchased for $499.99. Would Fotopark be redundant before it even launched?įotopark has two accounts: 10GB of storage for free 100GB for 10 Euros per month. My first thought when I heard of Fotopark was how it would compare to Flickr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |